Margin
Two Margin Models
Drake offers two distinct margin systems, each designed for different trading styles and risk preferences.
Cross Margin Portfolio (CMP)
Unified Collateral Approach
All positions share a single pool of collateral. Your entire portfolio is evaluated as one unit, with profitable positions supporting losing positions.
Key Characteristics:
One collateral pool backs all positions
Portfolio-wide margin calculation
Maximum capital efficiency
High leverage potential
All positions liquidate together if threshold breached
Best For:
Experienced traders managing multiple positions
Diversified portfolios with offsetting positions
Maximizing capital efficiency
Traders comfortable with portfolio-level risk
Isolated Margin Portfolio (IMP)
Separated Collateral Approach
Each position maintains its own dedicated collateral allocation. Positions operate independently with no interaction between them.
Key Characteristics:
Separate collateral per position
Individual position risk management
Lower capital efficiency
Risk contained to specific positions
Only individual positions liquidate
Best For:
Risk-conscious traders wanting position isolation
Testing new strategies with limited capital
High-risk speculative positions
Clear risk definition per trade
Margin Mode Comparison
Collateral Structure
Shared pool
Separate per position
Capital Efficiency
High
Lower
Maximum Leverage
Instrument-dependent
Instrument-dependent
Liquidation Risk
Portfolio-wide
Position-specific
Position Support
Profits help losses
No interaction
Complexity
Higher
Lower
Margin Calculation
Portfolio-level
Position-level
Collateral Requirements
Lower total
Higher total
Risk Management
Portfolio-level monitoring
Per-position monitoring
Liquidation Trigger
Portfolio ratio < 100%
Individual position ratio < 100%
Liquidation Impact
All positions close together
Only affected position closes
Margin Utilization
Can use 100% for all positions
Must allocate separately per position
Hedging Benefit
Positions offset each other
No cross-position benefit
Practical Example
Technical Architecture
Cross Margin Portfolio (CMP)
Margin Calculation:
Components:
Adjusted Equity: Collateral value with asset-specific haircuts applied
Unrealized PnL: Sum of all open position profits/losses
Maintenance Margin: Sum of minimum requirements across all positions
Thresholds:
Position opening: ~150% minimum
Withdrawals: ~150% must remain
Liquidation: ~100% triggers closure
Liquidation: All positions close simultaneously when portfolio ratio drops below threshold.
Isolated Margin Portfolio (IMP)
Margin Calculation:
Components:
Allocated Margin: Specific collateral assigned to position
Position PnL: Individual position profit/loss
Maintenance Margin: Minimum required for this position only
Position Independence:
Thresholds:
Position opening: ~150% minimum
Margin transfers: ~150% must remain
Liquidation: ~100% triggers individual position closure
Liquidation: Only the specific under-margined position closes.
Leverage Mechanics
Both systems support high leverage on select instruments, with maintenance requirements varying by asset volatility and liquidity.
Cross Margin:
Isolated Margin:
Maintenance Requirements by Instrument:
Risk Profiles
Cross Margin Risk
Advantages:
Maximum capital utilization
Natural hedging between positions
Lower total collateral requirements
Flexibility to add positions
Risks:
One bad position can liquidate entire portfolio
Complex portfolio-level monitoring required
Harder to isolate specific strategy performance
Cascade risk in extreme volatility
Example Scenario:
Isolated Margin Risk
Advantages:
Clear per-position risk definition
Liquidation limited to individual positions
Easier risk management and monitoring
Protected testing of new strategies
Risks:
Lower capital efficiency
Higher total collateral requirements
Cannot leverage profits to support other positions
More fragmented capital allocation
Example Scenario:
Last updated